The single-threaded performance gains over Zen 3 are incredible, but the CPU's multi-threaded performance is a lot less impressive. In all, this leaked Ryzen 5 7600X result is a strange one. The added E-cores of Intel's Alder Lake i5-12600K gives Intel's CPU a multi-threaded performance advantage, as AMD's Ryzen 5 7600X has six cores and the i5-12600K has six P-cores and four E-cores. When compared to Intel's i5-12600K, AMD's Ryzen 5 7600X has a single-threaded performance advantage and a multi-threaded performance disadvantage. In single-threaded performance, AMD's Ryzen 5 7600X result had a 56% performance lead over the Ryzen 5 5600X, but in multi-threaded performance the lead shrinks to 23.3%. In terms of multi-threaded performance, AMD's alleged Ryzen 5 7600X offers a much smaller performance lead over its Zen 3 predecessor than expected. This gives the Ryzen 5 7600X a 700 MHz base clock speed advantage over the Ryzen 5 5600X and a 350 MHz higher boost clock speed. This motherboard could be a new N7 series motherboard from NZXT, who have used ASRock in the past to create some of their latest motherboard designs.ĪMD's alleged Ryzen 5 7600X engineering sample featured a base clock speed of 4.4 GHz and a boost clock speed of 4.95 GHz. If these benchmarks are legitimate, AMD's Ryzen 7000 series should deliver huge performance gains over their Ryzen 5000 series counterparts, at least in the performance metrics that UserBenchmark finds important.ĪMD's Ryzen 7000 series Engineering sample was running on a ASRock N7-B65XT motherboard with DDR5 memory. These benchmark results were compiled by on Twitter, showcasing a 22% performance lead for AMD's Ryzen 7600X over Intel's i9-12900K, and a staggering 56% performance lead over AMD's Ryzen 5 5600X. P7zip Version 16.AMD's Ryzen 5 7600X is 22% faster than an i9-12900K in Userbenchmarkīenchmarks of an AMD Ryzen 7600X engineering sample have arrived on the UserBenchmark database, delivering levels of single-threaded performance that surpass Intel's Alder Lake i9-12900K by a significant margin. Results from my Pixel 2 phone: 7-Zip 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : ![]() Old question (with no selected answer yet □)īut I recently was looking for a tool available in multiple "distros" (Termux not really being a distro) including Ubuntu, and while the above mentioned packages are a common good choice, I read here: that 7-zip has a built-in benchmarking tool! And 7zip can be found in nearly every distros repository. Stress-ng: info: 0 Alignment Faults 0.00 sec Stress-ng: info: 0 CPU Migrations 0.00 sec ![]() Stress-ng: info: 220 Context Switches 3.67 sec Stress-ng: info: 0 Page Faults Major 0.00 sec Stress-ng: info: 8,532 Page Faults Minor 142.19 sec Stress-ng: info: (secs) (secs) (secs) (real time) (usr+sys time) ![]() Stress-ng: info: stressor bogo ops real time usr time sys time bogo ops/s bogo ops/s Stress-ng: info: successful run completed in 60.00s (1 min, 0.00 secs) To benchmark, for example, matrix product for 60 seconds on 4 CPU threads, use: stress-ng -cpu 4 -cpu-method matrixprod -metrics-brief -perf -t 60 To see the cpu related stress methods use: stress-ng -cpu-method which Install using: sudo apt-get install stress-ng The cpu stress test contains many different CPU stress methods covering integer, floating point, bit operations, mixed compute, prime computation, and a wide range of computations. It has a CPU stress test as one of the many stress tests built into the tool.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |